The IUT exam I almost didn't take seriously (Part VI)
Diaries of an admission season
Related News
Hello once again, knocking on your door for the last time in this series. It’s Sudipta, CSE ’22 at Buet, and today’s story is a little different from the rest, because this is the one exam in my entire admission journey I genuinely didn’t prepare for, and yet somehow ended up with a story worth telling. Fair warning: this article exists mostly to prove a point about accuracy over ambition, so stick with me.
The IUT exam I almost didn't take seriously (Part VI)
Hello once again, knocking on your door for the last time in this series. It’s Sudipta, CSE ’22 at Buet, and today’s story is a little different from the rest, because this is the one exam in my entire admission journey I genuinely didn’t prepare for, and yet somehow ended up with a story worth telling. Fair warning: this article exists mostly to prove a point about accuracy over ambition, so stick with me.
Let me be upfront about my mindset going in. IUT sits in Gazipur, and commuting there daily while trying to keep up with the rest of my academic life felt completely unrealistic. I also had zero interest in IUT’s dorm life. Genuinely, the only reason I sat for the exam at all was that their campus looked stunning in photos, and some small, curious part of me wanted to experience the exam itself. Not exactly the most strategic motivation in the world, but honest.
Since I hadn’t taken any dedicated preparation beyond solving IUT’s question bank, what I can offer you here isn’t a study plan, it’s an experience, and hopefully a useful lesson wrapped inside it.
The night before the exam, my best friend and I kept calling each other back and forth, both quietly checking whether the other had actually prepared. Neither of us had, and neither of us particularly cared, mostly because IUT’s negative marking system intimidated us more than the syllabus itself did. Neither of us fully understood how the deduction worked, so our entire strategy collapsed into one simple rule: make as few mistakes as possible. Beyond that, it was just the question bank and whatever time management instincts we’d built up from months of other exams.
I sat for the Dhaka region exam, and my seat, of all places, was inside Buet’s mechanical building. It was actually the first time I’d ever sat inside an actual Buet classroom for an exam, which felt strangely full-circle given where this whole series eventually led. I ran into another friend there, and we spent the time before the exam just wandering and chatting, genuinely unbothered about the outcome, the kind of relaxed energy you can only really have when you’ve mentally already accepted you might not get in anyway.
Then the exam started, and almost immediately, I fumbled. I made an error filling out my roll number on the top sheet and panicked hard enough that I had to call the invigilator over. Thankfully, he had spare OMR sheets on hand, calmly gave me a new one, and told me, quite kindly, to breathe and stay steady. He even double-checked my roll number the second time before wishing me luck. That small act of patience from him mattered more than he probably realised.
Here’s the thing though: even after that shaky start, I actually knew a lot of the content, because I’d already built strong shortcut techniques through months of Buet-focused prep. The problem wasn’t knowledge, it was confidence. That first mistake rattled me enough that I made a second error filling out the OMR sheet shortly after, and my composure took another hit. At that moment, I made an impulsive decision: I simply wouldn’t attempt the English section at all. I can’t fully explain the logic behind it even now. I think I was just protecting myself from further mistakes rather than chasing more marks.
I came home that day trying hard not to think about it, mentally already shifting focus towards the Buet written exam waiting ahead. Then, around 11:45 pm, my best friend called with my result, and to my genuine surprise, it was good. Good enough that skipping an entire section, fifteen marks worth, hadn’t cost me nearly as much as I’d feared.
So here’s the real, resourceful takeaway from this particular chapter, and I think it’s the most practical lesson in this entire series: in exams with negative marking, accuracy will almost always protect you better than ambition. It’s tempting to attempt every single question out of fear of “leaving marks on the table”, but a wrong answer under negative marking doesn’t just fail to help you, it actively costs you. A calm, selective approach where you only answer what you’re genuinely confident about will, more often than not, outperform a frantic attempt at everything.
If you’re sitting for an exam like IUT’s, here are a few actual guidelines I’d genuinely stand behind, drawn from this exact experience. First, understand the marking scheme in detail before exam day, not during it. Know exactly how much a wrong answer costs relative to a correct one, because that number should directly shape your strategy in the hall. Second, decide in advance roughly how confident you need to feel before attempting a question, and hold yourself to that line even under pressure, because panic has a way of convincing you to guess when you shouldn’t. Third, if you make an early mistake, and you likely will at some point in some exam, don’t let it snowball.
One wrong OMR bubble doesn’t have to become an entire ruined section; it’s a single fixable error, not a verdict on the rest of your exam. Fourth, and this one matters more than people admit, be kind to yourself in the exam hall the way that invigilator was kind to me. A steady voice, even your own internal one, can pull you back from a spiral faster than you’d expect.
Looking back at this entire series, from the medical exam heartbreak to MIST, from DU’s B unit gamble to the A unit’s brutal numbers, and now this oddly calm, half-prepared IUT experience, I think the pattern that ties everything together isn’t really about strategy at all. It’s about learning, slowly and sometimes painfully, that no single exam defines your worth, and that staying honest with yourself about your limits, your fears, and your actual capacity will serve you far better than chasing an idealised version of “the perfect candidate.”
Admission season asks a lot of every eighteen-year-old who walks through it, more than most people outside it ever fully understand. But I hope this series, messy and honest as it’s been, has shown you that the process is survivable, occasionally even a little funny in hindsight, and never something you have to walk through believing you’re the only one struggling.
Thank you for sticking with me through this entire journey. Wherever your own admission season takes you, I hope you hold onto your accuracy, your calm, and most importantly, yourself.
Read part 5: https://tbsgraduates.net/campus/diaries-of-an-admission-season/cracking-the-buet-code-part-v/
Read part 4: https://tbsgraduates.net/campus/diaries-of-an-admission-season/overcoming-dhaka-universitys-a-unit/
Read part 3: https://tbsgraduates.net/campus/diaries-of-an-admission-season/the-mist-dilemma-and-the-du-b-unit-gamble-part-iii/
Read part 2: https://tbsgraduates.net/campus/diaries-of-an-admission-season/the-medical-heartbreak-and-the-mist-comeback-part-ii/
Read part 1: https://tbsgraduates.net/campus/diaries-of-an-admission-season/choosing-the-battlefield-part-i/